Libor Rates in Canada Lawsuit Revealed

Libor Rates in Canada Lawsuit Revealed

The previous judge dismissed the Libor Rates in Canada lawsuit, stating that the process of setting the rate is collaborative and competitive and that manipulation of the rate did not cause an anti-competitive injury. However, a new judge has reinstated the lawsuits, and now the question is whether appellants suffered injury from paying artificially higher prices. Here’s what you need to know. Read on for more information.

Table of Contents


The recent announcement by the United States Department of Justice regarding the Libor Rates in Canada lawsuit against a large international bank comes amid an ongoing investigation into the manipulation of benchmark interest rates. The practice has led to billions of dollars in fines for banks worldwide. Deutsche Bank and other banks have also been punished with large fines for their role in manipulating the benchmark rate. Although the case is still ongoing, HSBC’s widespread global network, cost-saving initiatives, and solid asset growth have continued to support its shares. Although dismal economic growth in Europe and weak loan demand are likely to slow revenue growth over the next several quarters, HSBC shares have performed very well, rising 17.5% over the past year.

A recent ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated the litigation. This case involves a group of investors who bought investments based on the key lending rate known as LIBOR, or the London Interbank Offered Rate. The lawsuit alleges that the banks manipulated the LIBOR rate to increase profits for themselves by causing higher payments on adjustable-rate loans. It’s unclear how many people will join the suit, but it’s estimated to include as many as 100,000 individuals.

The HSBC lawsuit has been filed in the US, which is the same jurisdiction that brought the case against U.S. banks. The suit seeks to compel the bank to disclose the rates they used to lend money to clients. The court is likely to grant summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The decision is expected to be finalized soon. Meanwhile, the Canadian case focuses on the HSBC-Federal Reserve bank’s behavior.

The proposed changes to the IBOR rates in the U.S. are likely to affect operational processes and IT systems. If the changes are implemented, they could affect the value of these products, which may be no longer suitable for their intended purpose. HSBC is actively monitoring developments in this area and participating in industry working groups. It will provide more information once it’s available. There’s a chance the lawsuit will be settled in Canada.


The UBS Libor Rates in Canada lawsuit alleges that the Swiss bank misrepresented the integrity of the LIBOR benchmark. By manipulating the rate in the United States and Canada, the bank allegedly benefited from millions of dollars in swaps. Moreover, the manipulation of the rates prompted government entities to enter into financial instruments with UBS without knowing that they were being manipulated. In Canada, the government and the regulatory agencies are preparing to investigate UBS and the bank’s conduct.

Despite this ruling, the banks and the regulators have been preparing for trial. Their lawyers have not yet filed a reply to the ruling. The court is expected to rule on the case in a few weeks. However, if the settlement is final, the bank will be held liable for the damages caused to the class of investors. In the meantime, the lawsuits will continue. There are currently more than a dozen cases in various Canadian courts.

The US Department of Justice is pursuing the case against UBS, but the firm has already settled with regulators in Switzerland and England. UBS has already paid more than US$1.5 billion for the scandal and has also pleaded guilty to the charges. The Swiss regulator, Finma, cited over 2000 instances of wrongdoing by UBS employees. This settlement is expected to cause UBS to pay more than one billion dollars.

The settlement will allow UBS to self-discovery all the evidence in the case. The bank is allowed to search millions of documents and interview witnesses. It also agreed with the CFTC not to subpoena senior executives, including the UBS Libor Rates in Canada lawsuit. In return, the CFTC agreed to limit the scope of the investigation to formal board room minutes and official Pro-forma documents. That means emails, phone transcripts, and handwritten notes will no longer be admissible.

The UBS Libor Rates in Canada lawsuit alleges that a network of banks conspired to manipulate Libor rates between 2005 and 2010. The fraud undermines the integrity of the global financial system. It follows the sub-prime collapse and multi-billion-dollar TARP bailout of banks. The settlement is not surprising, given the current state of global financial markets. It also demonstrates the power of the media.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *